![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 11:07 +1000, Peter Williams wrote: > But your implication here is valid. It is better to fiddle with the > dynamic priorities than with nice as this leaves nice for its primary > purpose of enabling the sysadmin to effect the allocation of CPU > resources based on external considerations. I don't understand. It _is_ the administrator fiddling with nice based on external considerations. It just steadies the administrator's hand. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-31 04:49 [W:0.480 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||