![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thursday 31 August 2006 17:02, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > I will verify them when I get a chance to move to latest kernel. Sorry I just meant the problem has been analyzed, but not fixed yet (it is a bit tricky). Most of the fixes won't make 2.6.18 anyways because it's too late for that. > Unfortunately, so called testcases are the *real* problems I am > trying to track down in 2.6.18-rc4 and I have a setup/config/testcase > which can reproduce them consistently. I don't want to change > any kernel/config till I debug these issues. Once I figure out whats > happening - I will move to latest and verify one more time. Not needed right now. > > Code: 0f 0b 68 d3 e0 50 80 c2 e7 0a 48 83 7b 38 00 75 0a 0f 0b 68 > RIP [<ffffffff80282d39>] submit_bh+0x29/0x130 > RSP <ffff8101bde8dd08> > <1>Unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000146f4eac0 RIP: > [<ffffffff802277b8>] task_rq_lock+0x38/0x90 > PGD 1ddc2e067 PUD 0 > Oops: 0000 [2] SMP Don't know why sorry, but it seems to be indeed before the unwinder. Maybe some state got messed up completely. -Andi > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-31 15:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||