![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:07:44PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: > > Being a bit excited and it is really interesting to have such a > proposal, it would simplify the matters that held us up even more, > probably. The name sounds fine though. All i was wondering whether there > would be any high latencies for the same using in such a context. But > since the transfers would occur in any way, even with a kernel mode > driver, i think it should be pretty much fine. As mentioned, this framework is being used in industrial settings right now, where latencies are a huge issue. It works just fine, so I do not think there are any problems in this area. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-30 17:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||