lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [S390] cio: kernel stack overflow.
Date
Have you checked that in all cases all fields of the struct have
been overwritten? For instance, look at this:

Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>- chp->dev = (struct device) {
>- .parent = &css[0]->device,
>- .release = chp_release,
>- };
>+ chp->dev.parent = &css[0]->device;
>+ chp->dev.release = chp_release;

Doesn't this leave chp->dev.bus still holding whatever old value it
had laying around before? Unless I'm missing something, it looks to
me like this diff causes a change in the semantics of the code.

Perhaps it would be better to memset() the entire struct (chp->dev, in
this case) to zero, before assigning to individual fields, so there is
no possibility of old remnant data still being left laying around?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-30 19:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site