Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | IOMMU (Calgary) patches | | Date | Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:10:55 -0500 | | From | "Duran, Leo" <> |
| |
Andi, Jon, Muli,
I'm trying to build with the latest IOMMU patches for x86_64, so, I've pulled down 2.6.17, and the 2.6.18-rc3 patches... But, that's obviously lagging behind a bit.
Is there a source tree that you guys work from? (I'm hoping that there's a better mechanism than keeping track of patches as they are submitted here).
Leo Duran.
-----Original Message----- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:muli@il.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:24 AM To: Rolf Eike Beer Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Andi Kleen; discuss@x86-64.org Subject: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Move valid_dma_direction() from x86_64 to generic code On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:25:19AM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > ./arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:6:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h> > > ./drivers/net/fec_8xx/fec_main.c:40:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h> > > ./drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet.h:11:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h> > > ./include/asm-x86_64/swiotlb.h:5:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h> > > I suspect it to be a bug anyway that every of this files ever included
> asm/dma-mapping.h.
Agreed wrt the fs_enet and fec_8xx; the swiotlb stuff I dimly recall I had a reason for. I'll take a look in bit to verify akpm's fix works.
> > ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:27:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h> > > This is perfectly valid, isn't it :)
:-)
Cheers, Muli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |