[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
Andi Kleen wrote:
>>D) Virtual scan of mm's in the over-limit container
>>E) Modify existing physical scanner to be able to skip pages which
>> belong to not-over-limit containers.
> The same applies to dentries/inodes too, doesn't it? But their
> scan is already virtual so their LRUs could be just split into
> a per container list (but then didn't Christoph L. plan to
> rewrite that code anyways?)
how do you propose to handle shared files in this case?

> For memory my guess would be that (E) would be easier than (D) for user/file
> memory though less efficient.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-28 10:29    [W:0.146 / U:22.132 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site