[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
    Andi Kleen wrote:
    >>D) Virtual scan of mm's in the over-limit container
    >>E) Modify existing physical scanner to be able to skip pages which
    >> belong to not-over-limit containers.
    > The same applies to dentries/inodes too, doesn't it? But their
    > scan is already virtual so their LRUs could be just split into
    > a per container list (but then didn't Christoph L. plan to
    > rewrite that code anyways?)
    how do you propose to handle shared files in this case?

    > For memory my guess would be that (E) would be easier than (D) for user/file
    > memory though less efficient.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-28 10:29    [W:0.019 / U:285.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site