lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
On 8/26/06, hui Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:

> Stop using icecream or anything that might to any kind of binary object
> caching or header analysis to minimize compiles during the build. Make sure
> you're really cleaning the entire kernel directory before each build. Make
> sure it'a full build for starters.

Yes.

> Throw a #error in the __put_task_struct_inline(), not the alternative
> __put_task_struct(). It should bark at compile time and fail to compile
> kernel/fork.c

added

#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
void __put_task_struct_inline(struct task_struct *tsk)
#error Boo, you can't do this.

then

[rcrocomb@spanky test_2.6.17-rt8]$ make clean ; make -j4 > /dev/null
CLEAN /home/rcrocomb/kernel/test_2.6.17-rt8
CLEAN arch/x86_64/ia32
CLEAN init
CLEAN usr
CLEAN .tmp_versions
kernel/fork.c:134:6: error: #error Boo, you can't do this.
make[1]: *** [kernel/fork.o] Error 1
> The function __put_task_struct() should never show up a stack trace
> EVER. That function has been rename under all things CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> under my addendum patches. That's why I'm starting to think it's your
> build environment or you're miss applying the patches.

from sched.h:

static inline void put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&t->usage))
__put_task_struct(t);
}
but is it used?

[rcrocomb@spanky test_2.6.17-rt8]$ find ./ -name \*.c -print0 | xargs
-0 grep -l "put_task_struct(" | wc -l
30
Yes it is. Also, beginning at line 292 in what I call t6.diff (the
most recent URL, I believe):

+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
.
.
.

+
+/*
+ * We dont want to do complex work from the scheduler with preemption
+ * disabled, therefore we delay the work to a per-CPU worker thread.
+ */
+void fastcall __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ struct list_head *head;
+
+ head = &get_cpu_var(delayed_put_task_struct_list);
+ list_add_tail(&task->delayed_drop, head);
+
+ _wake_cpu_desched_task();
+
+ put_cpu_var(delayed_put_task_struct_list);
+}
+#endif
+
So I think you're mistaken. Patch is applied like this:

[rcrocomb@spanky test_2.6.17-rt8]$ patch -p0 < ../patches/t6.diff
patching file arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c
patching file arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
patching file fs/jbd/journal.c
patching file include/linux/hardirq.h
patching file include/linux/init_task.h
patching file include/linux/sched.h
patching file include/linux/seqlock.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
patching file kernel/exit.c
patching file kernel/fork.c
patching file kernel/panic.c
patching file kernel/printk.c
patching file kernel/rtmutex.c
patching file kernel/sched.c


Note that I've posted the sysrq stuff at:

http://66.93.162.249/~rcrocomb/2.6.16-rt8/

Sorry about screwing up your name: I turned 'hui' into your last name somehow.

--
Robert Crocombe
rcrocomb@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-28 20:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site