Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:58:13 +0200 (MEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: Conversion to generic boolean |
| |
>> Just would like to ask if you want patches for: > >Total NACK to any of this boolean ididocy. I very much hope you didn't >get the impression you actually have a chance to get this merged. > >> * (Most importent, may introduce bugs if left alone) >> Fixing boolean checking, ex: >> if (bool == FALSE) >> to >> if (!bool) > >this one of course makes sense, but please do it without introducing >any boolean type. Getting rid of all the TRUE/FALSE defines and converting >all scsi drivers to classic C integer as boolean semantics would be >very welcome janitorial work.
I don't get it. You object to the 'idiocy' (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/27/281), but find the x==FALSE -> !x a good thing?
Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |