![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Friday 25 August 2006 09:20, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Andi Kleen writes: > > > Best is to avoid undefined behaviour in new code. > > Of course. But do you have a way to implement per_cpu() without it? I was describing the ideal, not the practical reality. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-25 09:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||