![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:12:51 +0900 Masayuki Saito <m-saito@tnes.nec.co.jp> wrote: > It is the problem that i_flags of xfs_inode has no consistent > locking protection. > > For the reason, I define a new spin_lock(i_flags_lock) for i_flags > of xfs_inode. And I add this spin_lock for appropriate places. You could simply use inode.i_lock for this. i_lock is a general-purpose per-inode lock. Its mandate is "use it for whatever you like, but it must always be `innermost'" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-24 06:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||