![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Edward Falk <efalk@google.com> writes: > Add spin_lock_string_flags and _raw_spin_lock_flags() to > asm-x86_64/spinlock.h so that _spin_lock_irqsave() has the same > semantics on x86_64 as it does on i386 and does *not* have interrupts > disabled while it is waiting for the lock. Did it fix anything for you? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-24 08:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||