[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer
    On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:16:03 +0100 David Woodhouse wrote:

    > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 19:07 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > Do a "make menuconfig" and look at the number of options.
    > Why would I do that? I haven't done that for _years_. I've just edited
    > the .config file, removed the line which turns some option on or off,
    > then run 'make oldconfig'. I get asked about the option in question, and
    > then if I've turned something on I get asked about other options which
    > depend on it and which are now possible but weren't before.

    How do you do that if you have all of ISDN disabled and want/need
    to enable one ISDN driver? or same problem for V4L(2)/dvb?
    or several other subsystems? (e.g. sound)

    > Increasingly, these days, that approach has been failing due to all this
    > Aunt Tillie crap. I tried turning off CONFIG_KALLSYMS the other day, but
    > it took me a while to work out how. And the increasing use of 'select'
    > is even worse.
    > > There's e.g. no reason to ask all users whether they want to compile all
    > > I/O schedulers into their kernel.
    > >
    > > To avoid misunderstandings:
    > >
    > > I'm not talking about people subscribed to this list.
    > >
    > > It's more about a system administrator who must for some reason (e.g.
    > > hardware support or the requirement of some external patch) compile his
    > > own kernel.
    > Why on earth would they create a config file from scratch instead of
    > using a defconfig or the config from their distribution and modifying it
    > so suit their needs?
    > For most things, they ought to be able to just build extra modules to
    > _match_ their distribution's kernel, without having to rebuild the
    > kernel itself. (Although people doing stupid things in the kernel like
    > #ifdef CONFIG_foo_MODULE tends to screw them sometimes -- I can't build
    > IPv6 for my Nokia 770 without replacing its kernel, for example).
    > People just don't have that much cause to create configs from scratch --
    > there's little benefit in pandering to those who are less able. Make the
    > _defaults_ sane, by all means -- but don't just start hiding options.
    > However you dress it up, it's still ESR's Aunt Tillie come to haunt us.
    > And it's a PITA.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-24 19:35    [W:0.021 / U:11.496 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site