Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:01:02 -0700 | | From | Zachary Amsden <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h |
| |
Andi Kleen wrote: >> Yes, after discussion with Rusty, it appears that beefing up >> stop_machine_run is the right way to go. And it has benefits for >> non-paravirt code as well, such as allowing plug-in kprobes or oprofile >> extension modules to be loaded without having to deal with a debug >> exception or NMI during module load/unload. >> > > I'm still unclear where you think those debug exceptions will come from
kprobes set in the stop_machine code - which is probably a really bad idea, but nothing today actively stops kprobes from doing that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |