Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:53:03 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: Alpha: replacing "extern inline" |
| |
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:55:26PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:54:38AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Why? > > Because it inlines when it needs to, and does not generate > out of line code when its address is taken.
Ah, I start to remember.
Is this actually used anywhere in the kernel?
> > Can someone tell me which of the Alpha "static inline"'s need for some > > reason an __always_inline? > > There shouldn't be any. > > > Does the never defined __IO_EXTERN_INLINE still have any purpose? > > It is defined. > > $ grep 'define __IO_EXTERN_INLINE' * | wc -l > 12
Ups, I was blind...
> r~
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |