![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes: > Ar Sul, 2006-08-20 am 10:52 +0300, ysgrifennodd Kari Hurtta: > > Perhaps stupid suggestion: > > > > Should there be new signal for 'failure to drop privileges' ? > > ( perhaps SIGPRIV or is this name free ) > > > > By default signal terminates process. > > Programs are allowed (and now and then do) intentionally let a setuid > fail. A custom selinux or audit rule might be appropriate but that kind > of hackery is not. Commented code/patch used SIGKILL. By allocating new signal programs _are_ allowed intentionally let a setuid fail. / Kari Hurtta - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-21 07:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||