![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:30:46 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote: > I think it would be great to have the users choosing their preferred > maintainer to end the era of maintainers being decided by other > maintainers like you actually did. A simple website on kernel.org can > achieve it, where users can registers for voting and the maintainers > willing to maintain 2.6-stable can registers themself too. That's at > least less random than the current status if what you said above is > true and if 2.6.16-stable is meant to reach any critical mass. There's no need for a vote. Users already vote for a maintainer when they decide to use a paticular kernel tree. No user is forced to follow a particular maintainer. And anyone can step up and declare that they are also offering a maintained tree. And this situation is already self correcting; if no users follow, it's unlikely that a maintainer will continue doing the required work. And if a maintainer doesn't do a satisfactory job, it's very unlikely many people will choose to use that tree. Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-21 00:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||