![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:25:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:16:11AM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Can you send me the .config's you are using for 2.4 and 2.6 > > > (preferably for kernel.org kernels)? > > > > > > > I can send you only the current 2.4 config I use (not exactly vanilla). > > Thanks, but it didn't help me much since it needed some work getting it > compiling with uClinux-2.4.31-uc0, and the next step of creating a > functionally equivalent 2.6 kernel doesn't seem to be reasonably > possible. In his case, it is a very valid reason to stay on 2.4 right now, which was the original question IIRC. > My aim is to compare the size of the compiled objects for finding what > causes size regressions in 2.6 compared to 2.4. Sometimes it will be compilers, but not by that much. Gcc3.[34] generally produce bigger code than 2.95 at -O2, but I don't think that people in the embedded world still use 2.95 much. Cheers, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-19 06:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||