lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API)
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 11:35 +0400, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
    > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:31:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:53:40 +0400
    > > Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> wrote:
    > >
    > > > >>+struct user_beancounter
    > > > >>+{
    > > > >>+ atomic_t ub_refcount;
    > > > >>+ spinlock_t ub_lock;
    > > > >>+ uid_t ub_uid;
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Why uid? Will it be possible to club processes belonging to different
    > > > > users to same bean counter.
    > > > oh, its a misname. Should be ub_id. it is ID of user_beancounter
    > > > and has nothing to do with user id.
    > >
    > > But it uses a uid_t. That's more than a misnaming?
    >
    > It used to be uid-related in ancient times when the notion of container
    > hadn't formed up.
    > "user" part of user_beancounter name has the same origin :)

    Is it similarly irrelevant now? If so perhaps a big rename could be used
    to make the names clearer (s/user_//, s/ub_/bc_/, ...).

    <snip>

    Cheers,
    -Matt Helsley

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-18 10:43    [W:0.023 / U:62.276 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site