lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 18 Aug 2006 00:11:54 -0700
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:03:15 +0200
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 17 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It seems that the many-writers-to-different-disks workloads don't happen
> > very often.  We know this because
> > 
> > a) The 2.4 performance is utterly awful, and I never saw anybody
> >    complain and
> 
> Talk to some of the people that used DVD-RAM devices (or other
> excruciatingly slow writers) on their system, and they would disagree
> violently :-)

umm, OK, I guess that has the same cause: buffer_heads from different
devices all on the same single queue.  In this case the problem is that one
device is slow.  In the same-speed-devices case the problem is that all
writeback threads get stuck on the same device, allowing others to go idle.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-18 09:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008