[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: GPL Violation?
    Ar Gwe, 2006-08-18 am 02:51 -0700, ysgrifennodd David Schwartz:
    > Otherwise, for example, a printer by Lexmark could require a poem with the
    > words 'Copyright, Lexmark Inc.' at the end to be in a chip in the printer
    > cartridge and refuse to work if it wasn't there. This would, if enforceable,
    > prevent anyone from making compatible cartridges.

    True once upon a time (and people did this for IBM clone PC systems when
    IBM tried that in graphics cards)

    Once the phrase "Copyright, Lexamrk Inc." is checked to ascertain
    permissions you are in the world of the EUCD and DMCA. You are
    subverting a rights management system which places you on interestingly
    vague ground.

    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is clearly a rights management systems. Thats one of
    its little charms.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-18 18:33    [W:0.044 / U:204.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site