Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:30:14 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:10 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >> the binary search argument in this case is moot, just having a config > >> option doesn't break anything compile wise and each later step is > >> self-compiling.. > > > > Not true when the config used for the binary search has stack protector > > enabled. > > > oh? I thought I was pretty careful about that > > looking over the patches again I can't find any reason for a non-compiling/working kernel; at any step..
I just compiled each step separately [*] and they all compile just fine, and will work just fine as well...
[*] <shameless plug>thanks to the 2 1/2 minute full kernel compile time of my new Intel box with Woodcrest cpus </shameless plug>
-- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |