[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
    On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:10 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > Andi Kleen wrote:
    > >> the binary search argument in this case is moot, just having a config
    > >> option doesn't break anything compile wise and each later step is
    > >> self-compiling..
    > >
    > > Not true when the config used for the binary search has stack protector
    > > enabled.
    > >
    > oh? I thought I was pretty careful about that
    > looking over the patches again I can't find any reason for a non-compiling/working kernel; at any step..

    I just compiled each step separately [*] and they all compile just fine,
    and will work just fine as well...

    [*] <shameless plug>thanks to the 2 1/2 minute full kernel compile time
    of my new Intel box with Woodcrest cpus </shameless plug>

    if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-18 15:33    [W:0.019 / U:61.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site