lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 17 Aug 2006 20:21:27 +0100
FromJames Courtier-Dutton <>
SubjectRe: GPL Violation?
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 22:48 -0700, Anonymous User wrote:
>> I work for a company that will be developing an embedded Linux based
>> consumer electronic device.
>>
>> I believe that new kernel modules will be written to support I/O
>> peripherals and perhaps other things.  I don't know the details right
>> now.  What I am trying to do is get an idea of what requirements there
>> are to make the source code available under the GPL.
> 
> 
> you should talk to a lawyer, not LKML.
> 

The easiest, no need to talk to a lawyer, most economical, way out of
this is to simply make all source code open and published under the GPL
or GPL compatible license with the appropriate "signed-off" entries.

As soon as you start trying to release some part of it as binary code,
then lawyers have to be involved and that tends to cost a lot more.

People on this list are NOT lawyers, so don't ask about that option on
this list.

From the business perspective, it is likely to be far more profitable to
 deliver an open source GPL licensed product to market, as you are then
likely to get a lot of free development effort work done for you by your
users.

James

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-17 21:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2008