lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
From
Date
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:36 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:23 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > nor is it ambiguous in any way. It is very strict,
> > and very straightforward.
>
> What additional ambiguity you have when inode or task structures have
> the required information.

I think _I_ was being too ambiguous. ;)

When you uniquely assign a kernel object, say mapping->container, there
is no ambiguity.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-17 19:55    [W:0.706 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site