![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:45 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > We need more complex decrement/locking scheme than krefs > provide. e.g. in __put_beancounter() we need > atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() semantics for performance optimizations. Is it possible to put the locking in the destructor? It seems like that should give similar behavior. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-17 16:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||