lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half
    From
    From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
    Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:30:28 -0500

    > Why would you want o do this? It seems like a cruddier strategy
    > than what we can already do (which is to never get an transmit
    > interrupt, as long as the kernel can shove data into the device fast
    > enough to keep the queue from going empty.) The whole *point* of a
    > low-watermark interrupt is to never have to actually get the interrupt,
    > if the rest of the system is on its toes and is supplying data fast
    > enough.

    As long as TX packets get freed within a certain latency
    boundary, this kind of scheme should be fine.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-17 01:35    [W:0.022 / U:94.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site