lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 16 Aug 2006 08:28:39 +0200
From"Jan Beulich" <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix x86 cpuid keys used in alternative_smp()
>> By hard-coding the cpuid keys for alternative_smp() rather than using
>> the symbolic constant it turned out that incorrect values were used on
>> both i386 (0x68 instead of 0x69) and x86-64 (0x66 instead of 0x68).>>Thanks. Applied.>>I wonder if that was the reason why the .fill misassembly the 
>2.16.91.0.5 (10.1) binutils commits (see recent discuss report from
>Rafael) didn't cause crashes on UP machines.  Do you have
>an opinion on that?
That is well possible - I saw the mail, and I also wondered why this
wouldn't result in a broken kernel.

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-16 08:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2008