![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>> By hard-coding the cpuid keys for alternative_smp() rather than using >> the symbolic constant it turned out that incorrect values were used on >> both i386 (0x68 instead of 0x69) and x86-64 (0x66 instead of 0x68).>>Thanks. Applied.>>I wonder if that was the reason why the .fill misassembly the >2.16.91.0.5 (10.1) binutils commits (see recent discuss report from >Rafael) didn't cause crashes on UP machines. Do you have >an opinion on that? That is well possible - I saw the mail, and I also wondered why this wouldn't result in a broken kernel. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-16 08:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||