Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:17:33 -0400 | From | Jeff Dike <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack |
| |
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:45:48AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, > > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager. > > Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we > ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside > checkstack.
There is no use of the symbol SUBARCH in arch/i386. While this may be jarring to people who know and love Voyager, it doesn't break anything.
We could do what you suggest, but that sounds unnecessary.
I'd rather either leave things as they are rename SUBARCH
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |