![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>> even more, as I'm now looking at it, this code seems >> outright wrong in using iret since that unmasks NMIs - Stas, is >> your pending adjustment to the 16-bit stack handling going to >> overcome this?) >No, it leaves the NMI path almost untouched. >But what exactly problem do you see with this iret? >If it unmasks NMI, then it does so for reason, which >is a return from an NMI handler. What exactly is wrong >with it? Oh, yes, you're right, I didn't pay attention to the second do_nmi call in that path. Sorry, Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-14 08:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||