![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Monday 14 August 2006 07:38, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:59:49AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > Will we remember to add the check back in when we introduce new > > > dependencies on compiler versions? > > > > If something breaks it be readded. I see it only as a special > > hack for some extraordinary, and hopefully these problems won't happen again. > What we should add should be some kind of cabability mask. It would be probably overkill. > There is no need to require that modules are built with exactly the same > compiler as the kernel when it is only a very few compiler versions that > causes layout/ABI differences. On i386/x86-64 that's not the case anymore as far as I know. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-14 07:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||