lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:06:21PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru) wrote:
    > On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 05:46:07PM -0700, David Miller (davem@davemloft.net) wrote:
    > > From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
    > > Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:37:06 +0400
    > >
    > > > Does it? I though it is possible to only have 64k of working sockets per
    > > > device in TCP.
    > >
    > > Where does this limit come from?
    > >
    > > You think there is something magic about 64K local ports,
    > > but if remote IP addresses in the TCP socket IDs are all
    > > different, number of possible TCP sockets is only limited
    > > by "number of client IPs * 64K" and ram :-)
    >
    > I talked about working sockets, but not about how many of them system
    > can have at all :)

    working -> bound.

    --
    Evgeniy Polyakov
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-13 11:55    [W:0.031 / U:30.408 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site