lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:06:21PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru) wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 05:46:07PM -0700, David Miller (davem@davemloft.net) wrote:
> > From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
> > Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:37:06 +0400
> >
> > > Does it? I though it is possible to only have 64k of working sockets per
> > > device in TCP.
> >
> > Where does this limit come from?
> >
> > You think there is something magic about 64K local ports,
> > but if remote IP addresses in the TCP socket IDs are all
> > different, number of possible TCP sockets is only limited
> > by "number of client IPs * 64K" and ram :-)
>
> I talked about working sockets, but not about how many of them system
> can have at all :)

working -> bound.

--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-13 11:55    [W:0.242 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site