lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: ext3 corruption
Date
On Aug 13, 2006, at 15:21:24, Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
>> (This is open source, which means if people who have the bad
>> manners to kvetch that volunteers have done all of this free work
>> for them haven't done $FOO will be gently reminded that patches to
>> implement $FOO are always welcome. :-)
>
> OTOH, the open source community rigorously PR Linux as an
> alternative to Windows.

Some people do; some people believe it's still not ready (for the
desktop environment where Windows currently has majority
marketshare). I run a fileserver for my parents and wouldn't use
anything other than Linux/OpenLDAP/Samba/device-mapper/mdadm on fully
open-spec hardware, but I wouldn't expect them to do anything other
than call me when it breaks and maybe follow a few specific
instructions for getting it network-accessible again via server-
management chip. This is all really easy for _me_ to manage with
Linux on good server hardware, but that's not something I'd think a
non-admin could handle on their own. And for 3D graphics, GUI
programs, etc, IMHO Linux is still miles from being where it needs to
be to really compete.

> While the above attitude is fine by me, you're going to have to
> expect to see some sad faces from Windows users when they create a
> filesystem on a loop device and don't realize that the loop driver
> destroys journaling expectancies and results in all their photos
> and home videos going down the drain, all because nobody
> implemented a simple "warning!" message in the software.

This is really what distros are expected to do (at least in the
current environment). The major development groups don't have the
financial and legal backing to be able to certify reliability and
support for *any* user, let alone your average Joe User who's used to
Windows and *clicky*-*clicky*-ing his way around the UI. Eventually
there will be enough vendors selling Linux-based systems that the UI-
polish patches will be developed as rapidly as the fundamental
underlying infrastructure, but we're not there yet. Ubuntu and such
are paving the way for future even-better-than-mac vertical UI
integration but we have a lot of UI infrastructure (especially 3d
support in X) that needs fixing first. IMHO Linux is still very much
for hobbyists, server administrators, and other people who have at
least a modicum of computer problem-solving skills.

> (Or whatever. Lots of similar examples exist to show you that the
> "no warranty: you use our software, you learn to hack it to do what
> you want yourself or it's your own fault" argument is fallacious.)

That kind of warranty is a hobbyist-type warranty. Some companies
invest money to build upon that and provide server-admin-type or end-
user-type warranties, but such support costs money and time which
most upstream developers don't have.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-14 05:27    [W:0.783 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site