[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack
    On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
    > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
    > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
    > > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
    > > > name, rather than "um" to
    > >
    > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?
    > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying,
    > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.

    Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we
    ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside

    Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-10 18:51    [W:0.020 / U:43.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site