[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
> > > name, rather than "um" to
> >
> > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?
> SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying,
> host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.

Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we
ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside

Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-10 18:51    [W:0.063 / U:5.476 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site