Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:45:48 -0500 | | From | Matt Mackall <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack |
| |
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture > > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl. > > > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager? > > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.
Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside checkstack.
-- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |