Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:51:41 +0200 | From | Adrian Ulrich <> | Subject | Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion] |
| |
> suspect, particularly with 7200/min (s)ATA crap.
Quoting myself (again): >> A quick'n'dirty ZFS-vs-UFS-vs-Reiser3-vs-Reiser4-vs-Ext3 'benchmark'
Yeah, the test ran on a single SATA-Harddisk (quick'n'dirty). I'm so sorry but i don't have access to a $$$ Raid-System at home.
Anyway: The test shows us that Reiser4 performed very good on my (common 0-8-15) hardware.
> sdparm --clear=WCE /dev/sda # please.
How about using /dev/emcpower* for the next benchmark?
I mighty be able to re-run it in a few weeks if people are interested and if i receive constructive suggestions (= Postmark parameters, mkfs options, etc..)
Regards, Adrian
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |