lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] include/linux: Defining bool, false and true
ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote:
> Citerar "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>:
>
>> ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote:
>>> This patch defines:
>>> * a generic boolean-type, named "bool"
>>> * aliases to 0 and 1, named "false" and "true"
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>
>> Shouldn't this simply use _Bool?
>
> Well, it is (now) just a typedef of it. :)
>
> But I find it better, both because it is more similar to the common types:
> short, lowlettered words. But also because most editors with highlightning
> recognize "bool", but not "_Bool", as a type (as I found it).
>

<stdbool.h> should include:

typedef _Bool bool;
#define true 1
#define false 0

There is no enum involved.

-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-01 23:25    [W:0.207 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site