[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: reiser4: maybe just fix bugs?
    Pavel Machek wrote:
    > Hi!
    >>> * Are there plans for making reiserfsck interface compatible with fsck?
    >>> I mean, making it so that reiserfsck can be symlinked to fsck.reiser
    >>> and it will work? Currently, there seems to be some incompatibility
    >>> in command-line switches. (I will dig out details and send separately
    >>> when I'll get back to my Linux box.)
    >> Not sure what you mean. Forgive me, I have not supervised fsck as
    >> closely as other things.
    > fsck.ext2/fsck.vfat/... follow some convention including naming,
    > command line switches, and behaviour.
    > Like fsck.ext2 /dev/something is enough to check the fielsystem.
    > reiserfsck is missnamed (should be fsck.reiser), and it likes to chat
    > with you -- which is unexpected for tools.
    > Pavel

    Yeah, I would never imagine that for ext2 and ext3 fsck might be called
    'e2fsck'. ;-)

    "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about
    telescopes." - Edsger Dijkstra
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-01 16:01    [W:0.020 / U:9.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site