[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
    On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:38 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

    > Actually, as I said above, as soon as we are _sure_ that LRU pages are not
    > touched after the memory has been snapshotted, my patch will be mergeable
    > and we'll get the ability to create bigger images without the added
    > complexity. [Apart from the fact that the whole memory image on a box with
    > more that 512 MB of RAM wouldn't make much sense, IMHO.] The _only_ thing
    > needed here is an argument which you have to provide anyway to show that
    > suspend2 does the right thing.
    > As far as the support for ordinary files, swap files, etc. is concerned,
    > there's nothing to worry about. It's comming.

    This all sounds very encouraging. What's the rough timeframe for this?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-08 13:17    [W:0.018 / U:70.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site