Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 8 Jul 2006 01:25:23 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability |
| |
> > So what Pavel wants can be > > translated as 'please use already merged code, it can already do what > > you want without further changing kernel'. > > Like we'd want to use unreviewed, extremely new and risky code for > something that happily destroy filesystems.
You can either use suspend2 (14000 lines of unreviewed kernel code, old) or uswsusp (~500 lines of reviewed kernel code, ~2000 lines of unreviewed userspace code, new).
Of course, you can also use swsusp (~2000 lines of reviewed kernel code, pretty old) if stability matters to you more than graphical progress bar.
I know what I'm picking, and I'm pretty sure I know what mainline/distros will pick.
If you want to help, you are welcome to test/review any component. But stop producing hot air. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |