[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: swsusp / suspend2 reliability
On Fri 2006-07-07 20:03:08, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:50:31PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I know users that installed swsusp, decided they want progress bars,
> > and went for suspend2.
> I know users that installed swsusp, decided they wanted working
> suspend, and brought a mac.
> > Nigel only submitted his code once, month or so ago, as series of 200
> > or so patches. Do not blame me for _that_.
> Nigel submitted his code on 2004-09-16, 2004-11-24, 2005-07-05,
> 2006-01-25, 2006-03-28 and 2006-06-26.

Lets check for example 2006-03-28...

No... this is not submission of suspend2. It is info that new version
of it is available, with only url (!) of .tar.bz2 (!) given. With no
signed-off-by: headers, no patches, no changelogs.

Read relevant documentation if you want to know how patch submission
(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-08 01:25    [W:0.112 / U:6.900 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site