[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: swsusp / suspend2 reliability
    On Fri 2006-07-07 20:03:08, Olivier Galibert wrote:
    > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:50:31PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > I know users that installed swsusp, decided they want progress bars,
    > > and went for suspend2.
    > I know users that installed swsusp, decided they wanted working
    > suspend, and brought a mac.
    > > Nigel only submitted his code once, month or so ago, as series of 200
    > > or so patches. Do not blame me for _that_.
    > Nigel submitted his code on 2004-09-16, 2004-11-24, 2005-07-05,
    > 2006-01-25, 2006-03-28 and 2006-06-26.

    Lets check for example 2006-03-28...

    No... this is not submission of suspend2. It is info that new version
    of it is available, with only url (!) of .tar.bz2 (!) given. With no
    signed-off-by: headers, no patches, no changelogs.

    Read relevant documentation if you want to know how patch submission
    (cesky, pictures)
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-08 01:25    [W:0.023 / U:19.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site