Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:35:31 -0400 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: lost cpufreq (Re: Linux v2.6.18-rc1) |
| |
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:27:06PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:07:39PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:52:39PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:26:35PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, > > > > the merge window for 2.6.18 is closed, and -rc1 is out there > > > > > > ... and cpufreq-nforce2.ko fails to work. Module can't be loaded: > > > FATAL: Error inserting cpufreq_nforce2 > > > (/lib/modules/2.6.18-rc1/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.ko): > > > Device or resource busy > > > > > > Here's relevant difference between dmesg of 2.6.17 and 2.6.18-rc1: > > > > > > @@ -244,7 +240,6 @@ > > > lp: driver loaded but no devices found > > > cpufreq: Detected nForce2 chipset revision C1 > > > cpufreq: FSB changing is maybe unstable and can lead to crashes and data loss. > > > -cpufreq: FSB currently at 165 MHz, FID 10.5 > > > usbcore: registered new driver usbfs > > > usbcore: registered new driver hub > > > > Does it work again if you apply this patch with -R ? > > No.
That's puzzling, as the only other changes to cpufreq-nforce are completely cosmetic (whitespace and the like).
Dave
-- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |