lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 6 Jul 2006 22:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
FromLinus Torvalds <>
SubjectRe: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT

On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Von: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
> > On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > > 
> > > Is it necessary that the futex syscall ignores SA_RESTART?
> > 
> > Very possibly. That was definitely the case for "select()" long ago.
> 
> Why was this necesary back then?

I forget the exact details, but certain X applications would stop 
responding, because they would restart their select() system call in their 
main select-loop, rather than go through the loop.

I _think_ it was SIGALARM installed with SA_RESTART (and doing itimers 
every 10 ms), but I didn't really care enough - we had select() return 
ERESTARTSYS for exactly one day back in 199x, and when I figured out what 
broke, it got reverted pronto.

I want to say that the failing app was "oneko" (damn, I should try to find 
if it still exists - brings back memories of an earlier time), but the 
point being that it's enough that one app breaks.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-07 05:13    [W:0.205 / U:0.570 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans