lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] spinlocks: remove 'volatile'
FromArjan van de Ven <>
DateThu, 06 Jul 2006 14:39:43 +0200
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 08:29 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:> > > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 07:59 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> >> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:> >>> >>>> >>> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I wonder if we should remove the "volatile". There really isn't
> >>>> anything _good_ that gcc can do with it, but we've seen gcc code
> >>>> generation do stupid things before just because "volatile" seems to
> >>>> just disable even proper normal working.> >>> >> Then GCC must be fixed. The keyword volatile is correct. It should
> >> force the compiler to read the variable every time it's used.> >> > this is not really what the C standard says.> >> >> >> >> This is not pointless. If GCC generates bad code, tell the
> >> GCC people. The volatile keyword is essential.> >> > no the "volatile" semantics are vague, trecherous and evil. It's a LOT
> > better to insert the well defined "barrier()" in the right places.> > Look at:> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatile_variable> > This is just what is needed to prevent the compiler from making non working
> code during optimization.

and an entry level document at wikipedia is more important than the C
standard ;)

> > Also look at:> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_barrier> > This is used to prevent out-of-order execution, not at all what is
> necessary.

I did not talk about memory barriers. In fact, barrier() is NOT a memory
barrier. It's a compiler optimization barrier!


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-06 14:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2008