lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:00:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Randy.Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
>
> > > well, the allnoconfig thing is artificial (and the uninteresting) for a
> > > number of reasons:
> >
> > hm, I'd have to say that allyesconfig is also artificial and the
> > savings numbers are somewhat uninteresting in that case too.
>
> well the 'allyesconfig' isnt the true allyesconfig but one with most
> debugging options disabled. It is quite close to a typical distro config
> - hence very much relevant. (I wanted to use something that is easy to
> reproduce.) Believe me, for large configs the savings are real.

What is the difference between "most debugging options disabled" and
"all debugging options disabled"?

> Ingo

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-06 01:17    [W:0.254 / U:1.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site