Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:10:21 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions |
| |
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:00:09 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Randy.Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote: > > > > well, the allnoconfig thing is artificial (and the uninteresting) for a > > > number of reasons: > > > > hm, I'd have to say that allyesconfig is also artificial and the > > savings numbers are somewhat uninteresting in that case too. > > well the 'allyesconfig' isnt the true allyesconfig but one with most > debugging options disabled. It is quite close to a typical distro config > - hence very much relevant. (I wanted to use something that is easy to > reproduce.) Believe me, for large configs the savings are real.
I would expect distros to use something close to all*mod*config (with some debug options disabled).
--- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |