Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: ipw3945 status | From | Kasper Sandberg <> | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:32:19 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 09:06 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 7/31/06, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk> wrote: > > I entirely agree that this should not be merged, those will accept these > > kindof things, can use intels out of tree driver. > > > > i sincerely hope for a forked/rewritten driver which does not depend on > > closed userspace daemons. > > I personally think that this also violates the GPL license... > The GPL part cannot stand by it-self and require none GPLed component > in order to make it work. > > The fact that the regularity daemon work using external sysfs > interface without linkage requirements does not escape derived work in > this case. i tend to agree, however if a generic interface was created for "regulatory daemons" this may be different, but if what i hear is true, the intel daemon does more than that, and then, well...
> > Best Regards, > Alon Bar-Lev > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |