Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] PCI-Express AER implemetation: Add new defines to pci_regs.h | From | "Zhang, Yanmin" <> | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:40:34 +0800 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 13:06, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:38:18PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 12:00, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:10:39AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > > > Although Greg already accepted the second patch into his testing tree, > > > > I still resend it to keep the patch integrity. > > > > > > Why? This is already in 2.6.18-rc3. > > I checked 2.6.18-rc3 and it doesn't include the patch of pci_regs.h. > > I just looked, and it is there. Look at git commit > 6f0312fd7e0e6f96fd847b0b2e1e0d2d2e8ef89d to see it. I downloaded 2.6.18-rc3 tarball from http://www.kernel.org directly. Perhaps you mean the git tree, not 2.6.18-rc3?
> > > > Please redo the whole series against 2.6.18-rc3, not 2.6.17, otherwise > > > it's a pain to forward port... > > The patches could be applied to 2.6.18-rc3 cleanly. There is no any > > confliction and I tested them under 2.6.18-rc3. > > Based on the above statement, I'm not so sure I believe that :) > > > Is it necessary to rebase to 2.6.18-rc3? > > You should at least regenerate them, yes. I couldn't get git tree, but I could rebase my patches against 2.6.18-rc3, and delete the pci_reg patch. Is it ok for you?
Thanks, Yanmin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |