![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Al Boldi wrote:> > Well, ramfs has some pitfalls, which doesn't make it suitable for a > > long-lived rootfs. OTOH, tmpfs is much more mature, while semantically > > the same.> >> > Being semantically the same, while not exhibiting ramfs pitfalls, makes > > it suitable to be pushed into the -stable tree, IMHO.>> This is total nonsense. Are you sure? > They're very different from an implementation standpoint. Think ext2/3. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-31 23:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||