![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Al Boldi wrote: > > Well, ramfs has some pitfalls, which doesn't make it suitable for a > long-lived rootfs. OTOH, tmpfs is much more mature, while semantically the > same.> > Being semantically the same, while not exhibiting ramfs pitfalls, makes it > suitable to be pushed into the -stable tree, IMHO.> This is total nonsense. They're very different from an implementation standpoint. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-31 21:29 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||