Messages in this thread |  | | | From | "Hua Zhong" <> | | Subject | RE: suspend2 merge history [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion] | | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:55:58 -0700 |
| |
> > Suspend2 patch is open source. You can always take a look. > > swsusp is open source. You can always take a look. And you > can always submit a patch. > > > Moreover, if someone claims suspend2 isn't ready for merge, or the > > Moreover, if someone claims swsusp is broken, they should > attach bugzilla id.
Pavel,
You can't blame me for not doing these things, because I am not a maintainer. However, you are, and you defend yourself so hard for that position, so if _you_ don't do these things, people complain.
> As you said, you do not know what you are talking about. > > He claims s-t-ram is easier than s-t-disk. That means that he did not do his > homework, and did not check the archives on the subject.
Oh yeah? Let's check the archives:
"I seriously claim that STR _should_ be a lot simpler than suspend-to-disk, because it avoids all the memory management problems. The reason that we support suspend-to-disk but not STR is totally perverse - it's simply that it has been easier to debug, because unlike STR, we can do a "real boot" into a working system, and thus we don't have the debugging problems that the "easy" suspend/resume case has." http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/1884/focus=2105
Maybe it's why he didn't like the STR design you had?
Maybe I am still wrong, maybe Linus is wrong too, but you can't attack me not doing my homework.
Hua
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |