Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:20:46 -0400 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4 |
| |
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:08:01AM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > > went ok. I wonder if something changed in acpi recently that caused this > > change in behaviour ? Len ? > > Dave, > > I'm no expert but I think it was you that made this change in > http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;h=567b39bea07e4fbbe091b265b010905e3d30ff5a;hp=1a7bdcef19261deff5a7ea8ee13d5a8ddb434a19;hb=911cb74bb9e77e40749abc2fca6fe74d87d940f3;f=arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > > + /* Do initialization in ACPI core */ > + acpi_processor_preregister_performance(acpi_perf_data); > + return 0; > +} > > :-)
I'm puzzled. As that commit message doesn't match the diff. If you click "commitdiff", you'll see the actual commit for that msg, which is a one-liner.
Your change in your previous mail makes sense to me though, so I'll commit it to cpufreq.git later today.
Dave
-- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |