Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:06:31 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/12] making the kernel -Wshadow clean - fix mconf |
| |
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:48:23 +0200 "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps I am misreading this patch set? > > > i don't think you are. It's just that I want to take the least > intrusive route *now*, make us -Wshadow clean, get -Wshadow to be an > accepted part of the Makefile, *then* deal with the more > intrusive/controversial renamings, where I guess you'd have done > things in the opposite order - right?
yup. Experience tells us that it's better to get things right first time, because we don't get around to doing the intended second pass (looks at lock_cpu_hotplug())
That being said, no, we can't go and rename up(). Let us go through the patches one-at-a-time.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |